Cloud spending has become one of the most unpredictable expenses on your P&L statement. What started as a predictable monthly expense has transformed into a maze of variable charges, usage spikes, and hidden fees that make financial forecasting nearly impossible. For CFOs at PE-backed SaaS companies, this represents more than just a cost management challenge—it’s a direct threat to EBITDA targets and portfolio valuations.
The solution requires more than traditional cost-cutting measures. You need strategic alignment between financial leadership and operating partners to tackle cloud spend systematically across your portfolio. When done correctly, this collaboration can deliver the 20-30% cost savings through focused cloud cost optimization.
The Hidden Financial Impact of Uncontrolled Cloud Spending
Understanding why cloud costs have become so difficult to manage requires examining the underlying pricing models that public cloud providers use. These models prioritize provider revenue optimization rather than customer cost predictability.
Variable Pricing Creates Budget Uncertainty
Traditional infrastructure planning involved predictable capital expenditures and depreciation schedules. Cloud infrastructure operates on variable pricing that fluctuates based on usage, data transfer, and service consumption patterns. This creates several financial planning challenges that directly impact your ability to meet EBITDA projections.
Usage-based pricing means your infrastructure costs scale with business activity, but not always proportionally. Customer onboarding spikes, data processing increases, or traffic surges can trigger cost increases that outpace revenue growth. Research from Andreessen Horowitz reveals that cloud costs can reach 50% of total cost of revenue for software companies, making this unpredictability a material financial risk.
Egress Fees Accumulate Without Warning
Data transfer costs represent one of the most insidious hidden expenses in public cloud environments. These charges appear minimal during initial deployment but compound as your SaaS companies grow their customer bases and increase data processing requirements.
The challenge is that egress fees are largely invisible during budgeting phases. Finance teams focus on compute and storage costs during planning, but data transfer pricing only becomes apparent after deployment when changing architecture becomes expensive and disruptive. This creates a situation where actual costs consistently exceed budgeted amounts.
Resource Waste in Shared Environments
Public cloud providers design their infrastructure to maximize their own economics, not yours. In typical deployments, workloads use roughly 30% of allocated resources on average, leaving approximately 40% of VM resources wasted. Yet you still pay for 100% of those allocated resources whether you use them or not.
This waste occurs because hyperscalers force you to choose from predetermined instance types that rarely align with actual workload requirements. Your applications need specific combinations of CPU, memory, and storage, but you’re constrained to pick from what providers offer, not what your applications actually need.
Why CFO and Operating Partner Alignment Matters
The complexity of modern cloud pricing makes it impossible for finance teams to manage cloud costs without deep operational understanding. Similarly, operating partners can’t implement cost optimization strategies without clear financial context and targets. This creates a need for systematic collaboration that goes beyond traditional budget approval processes.
Bridging the Knowledge Gap
CFOs understand the financial impact of cloud spending on EBITDA and valuation multiples, but may lack visibility into the technical drivers of those costs. Operating partners understand infrastructure requirements and optimization opportunities, but may not fully grasp how those decisions impact financial performance.
Bain research identifies that companies deriving the most value from cloud depend on “close alignment of technology and the business” as a critical success factor. This alignment becomes particularly important when cloud spending approaches levels that materially impact gross margins.
Portfolio-Level Optimization Opportunities
Operating partners have visibility across multiple portfolio companies, allowing them to identify patterns and opportunities that individual finance teams might miss. Companies may be making similar infrastructure decisions independently, missing opportunities for standardization and bulk optimization.
The compounding effect across a portfolio can be substantial. If multiple portfolio companies are approaching cloud spending levels of 50-75% of cost of revenue, coordinated infrastructure optimization can deliver millions in annual cost savings and tens of millions in increased valuations.
Creating Accountability for Cost Management
Without clear ownership structures, cloud cost optimization often falls into the gap between finance and operations. Finance teams track spending but can’t directly control resource allocation decisions. Engineering teams make technical choices but may not understand their financial implications.
Successful cloud cost management requires creating shared accountability between CFOs and operating partners, with clear metrics and regular review processes that connect technical decisions to financial outcomes.
How Infrastructure Predictability Improves Financial Planning
The key to managing cloud costs lies in moving from variable, usage-based pricing to predictable cost structures that align with your financial planning processes. This requires infrastructure approaches that prioritize cost transparency over operational flexibility.
Fixed Monthly Pricing Eliminates Variable Surprises
OpenMetal’s model is based on fixed monthly pricing tied to dedicated hardware capacity rather than per-use billing. A three-server Cloud Core, for example, is priced according to the hardware configuration, not the number of virtual machines or containers deployed. This removes the uncertainty of instance-based or transaction-based charges.
This pricing approach allows finance teams to treat infrastructure spending like traditional capital equipment with predictable monthly costs. You can model different growth scenarios without worrying about usage spikes triggering cost increases that outpace revenue growth.
Structured Egress Management
Each server includes an egress allowance that aggregates across clusters. Usage above those allowances is billed using a 95th percentile measurement, which averages out short traffic spikes instead of charging for every peak. This method reduces the risk of unexpected overages and helps finance teams model costs with greater accuracy.
This approach provides the cost predictability finance teams need while maintaining the technical flexibility operations teams require. You can plan for data transfer costs without worrying about sudden spikes in customer activity triggering surprise charges.
Unmetered Internal Traffic
Networking is structured to prevent hidden charges that often catch finance teams off guard. Each server includes dual 10 Gbps private links with unmetered traffic between servers. This means internal application and database traffic can move freely without generating additional fees.
This eliminates one of the most unpredictable cost components in public cloud environments. Database replication, application communication, and backup processes can operate without triggering data transfer charges that compound over time.
Implementing Strategic Cost Optimization
Successful cloud cost reduction requires more than switching providers or renegotiating contracts. It demands systematic approaches that align technical infrastructure decisions with financial objectives and create ongoing processes for optimization.
Portfolio Assessment and Prioritization
Not every portfolio company benefits equally from infrastructure optimization. The best candidates typically have annual cloud spending approaching $1 million or more, predictable workload patterns with consistent resource requirements, and cloud costs representing 50% or more of cost of revenue.
CFOs and operating partners should collaborate on identifying which companies represent the highest-value optimization opportunities. This analysis should consider both current spending levels and projected growth trajectories to prioritize companies where infrastructure changes will have the most significant EBITDA impact.
Hardware Tiering for Cost Predictability
OpenMetal’s hardware is offered in defined tiers—Medium, Large, XL, XXL—so finance teams can map workloads to predictable cost brackets. The performance of each tier is consistent because it is tied to dedicated physical servers rather than shared virtualized capacity. This consistency makes it easier to match cost to performance across different portfolio companies.
This tiered approach allows operating partners to right-size infrastructure based on actual requirements rather than being forced into public cloud instance types that don’t align with workload needs. Finance teams gain cost predictability while operations teams maintain performance consistency.
Migration Strategy and Timeline Planning
Successful transitions don’t require moving all workloads simultaneously. Production workloads with predictable resource requirements represent the best candidates for initial migration, allowing teams to validate performance and cost savings before expanding the migration scope.
Data-intensive applications typically see the largest cost savings from private cloud migration since these workloads often trigger significant egress charges in public cloud but operate efficiently within private cloud environments. CFOs should work with operating partners to identify these high-impact migration candidates first.
Operational Efficiency and Cost Control
Beyond pricing structure changes, infrastructure optimization should address the operational costs associated with managing cloud environments. These soft costs often represent significant hidden expenses that impact overall financial performance.
Rapid Deployment and Scaling
OpenMetal’s infrastructure can be deployed in under a minute and scaled in about twenty minutes. This reduces the time and labor costs normally associated with infrastructure changes, accelerating time to value while lowering operational overhead.
For finance teams tracking fully-loaded infrastructure costs, this operational efficiency translates to lower total cost of ownership beyond just the monthly infrastructure fees. Faster deployment means reduced engineering time spent on infrastructure management and faster time-to-market for new features and products.
Included Support Services
Support and migration services are included in the model. Engineer-assisted onboarding, ramp pricing for companies moving off public cloud, and direct engineer-to-engineer support provide stability during transitions. For CFOs and operating partners, this translates into fewer unforeseen costs during migration and clearer long-term cost planning.
This integrated support model eliminates the need for additional consulting or migration services that often create budget overruns during infrastructure transitions. The predictable cost structure includes the support needed for successful implementation.
Measuring and Tracking Value Creation
Implementing cloud cost optimization requires establishing metrics and processes that connect infrastructure decisions to financial outcomes. This measurement approach should satisfy both operational requirements and financial reporting needs.
EBITDA Impact Tracking
The financial impact of infrastructure optimization extends far beyond monthly cost savings. High-growth software companies often trade at 24-25x gross profit multiples, meaning every dollar of gross profit saved through infrastructure optimization translates to $24-25 in market capitalization gains.
CFOs should work with operating partners to establish tracking systems that connect infrastructure cost savings to EBITDA improvement and valuation impact. This requires moving beyond monthly cost reports to comprehensive analyses that show how infrastructure decisions affect overall financial performance.
Portfolio-Level Value Creation
For PE firms, the ability to bring consistency to infrastructure governance across the portfolio creates additional value beyond individual company cost savings. Instead of each company managing cloud costs differently, standardized approaches help portfolio companies align their infrastructure to growth and margin goals.
Operating partners can implement repeatable optimization models that work across multiple companies, creating efficiency gains at the portfolio level. This systematic approach often delivers better results than individual company optimization efforts.
Regular Optimization Reviews
Infrastructure optimization shouldn’t be a one-time project. Regular audits of resource utilization help identify opportunities for further cost reduction, and architectural reviews ensure new developments don’t introduce unnecessary complexity or cost.
CFOs and operating partners should establish quarterly review processes that examine both cost performance and technical efficiency. These reviews should identify optimization opportunities and ensure that infrastructure decisions continue supporting financial objectives as companies grow and evolve.
Making Infrastructure a Financial Engineering Priority
For private equity operating partners and CFOs, recognizing infrastructure optimization as a financial engineering opportunity rather than just a technical decision becomes essential for maximizing value creation. This perspective shift requires treating infrastructure spend as a key performance indicator rather than just an operational expense.
By combining fixed pricing, predictable egress, unmetered internal networking, and structured support, private cloud infrastructure allows financial leaders to approach cloud spending as a manageable, forecastable part of the P&L instead of a volatile line item. This predictability creates the foundation for strategic collaboration between CFOs and operating partners.
The most effective approach involves early assessment of each portfolio company’s cloud spending trajectory and implementation of cost tracking practices that identify optimization opportunities before they become critical to address. Given that infrastructure costs directly impact gross margins and, consequently, valuations, the ROI on infrastructure optimization efforts can exceed traditional operational improvements.
Understanding how cloud cost unpredictability undermines EBITDA represents the first step toward reclaiming control over infrastructure spending and unlocking the value trapped in inefficient cloud architectures. For CFOs and operating partners looking to reduce cloud spend across portfolios and increase EBITDA, this collaborative approach delivers both immediate cost savings and long-term financial predictability.
Ready to evaluate how private cloud can improve your portfolio’s financial performance? Explore OpenMetal’s PE firm program →
Read More on the OpenMetal Blog