Modern GPU technologies offer multiple methods for sharing hardware resources across workloads. Two widely used approaches are Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) and time-slicing. Both methods aim to improve utilization and reduce costs, but they differ significantly in implementation, performance, and isolation.


Multi-Instance GPU (MIG)

MIG is a feature introduced with NVIDIA’s Ampere architecture. It partitions a single physical GPU into multiple smaller, isolated GPU instances. Each instance behaves like an independent GPU, with dedicated compute cores, memory slices, and L2 cache.

Key Features of MIG:

  • Hardware-level partitioning: Provides dedicated resources such as memory controllers, streaming multiprocessors, and cache slices to each instance.
  • Isolation: Ensures fault isolation, memory bandwidth quality of service (QoS), and predictable performance. One instance’s workload cannot interfere with others.
  • Scalability: Supports up to seven instances per GPU on models like the A100 and H100.
  • Deployment flexibility: Integrates with virtualization platforms, containers (Docker, Kubernetes), and bare metal deployments.
  • Use Case: Ideal for serving multiple workloads that require guaranteed resources and consistent performance, such as AI inference tasks in multi-tenant cloud environments.

MIG’s design enables efficient use of large GPUs when individual workloads cannot fully utilize the GPU’s capacity. This partitioning prevents resource contention and performance degradation between tenants.


Time-Slicing

Time-slicing is a software-based GPU sharing technique. Instead of splitting the GPU hardware, the GPU is shared by scheduling workloads in sequence. Each workload gets full access to the GPU for a short period before switching to the next workload.

Characteristics of Time-Slicing:

  • No hardware partitioning: All jobs share the same GPU memory and compute resources without dedicated isolation.
  • Higher user density: Supports many users by quickly switching between jobs.
  • Limited isolation: Workloads can impact each other through memory contention or delayed scheduling.
  • Use Case: Suitable for bursty, low-priority tasks or general-purpose GPU access where absolute performance isolation is unnecessary.

Time-slicing can also extend GPU sharing to older generations that do not support MIG.


Performance and Isolation Comparison

FeatureMulti-Instance GPU (MIG)Time-Slicing
Resource AllocationHardware-level partitioningScheduled sequential sharing
IsolationFull memory and fault isolationLimited, shared memory and compute
LatencyLow, predictableVariable, depending on queue length
Performance QoSHigh, consistentUnpredictable under load
User CapacityLimited by instance count (up to 7)Higher due to fast context switching
CompatibilityRequires Ampere or newer GPUsAvailable on older GPUs
Virtualization SupportSupported with VMs and containersSupported but with reduced guarantees

Combining MIG and Time-Slicing

These two methods are not mutually exclusive. Time-slicing can operate inside MIG instances to further increase user density. For example, in Kubernetes environments, MIG provides baseline isolation and time-slicing enables multiple workloads to share a single MIG partition. This hybrid approach balances performance with cost efficiency.


OpenMetal Support and Industry Adoption

OpenMetal supports both MIG and time-slicing GPU sharing methods within our OpenStack environments and as bare metal. This enables users to select the approach best suited for their workload requirements.

Most GPU providers don’t offer access to both MIG and time-slicing configurations. MIG is more commonly available but support for time-scale is less common. Our support for both methods provides additional flexibility and control, allowing users to optimize for performance, cost, or resource efficiency.


Choosing Between MIG and Time-Slicing

ScenarioRecommended Approach
AI inference requiring predictable latencyMIG
Multi-tenant environments needing isolationMIG
General-purpose GPU access for many usersTime-Slicing
Legacy GPU supportTime-Slicing
High concurrency with mixed workloadsMIG combined with Time-Slicing

MIG offers stronger performance isolation and is preferred for workloads requiring consistent compute and memory resources. Time-slicing provides broader access at the cost of performance variability and is useful for applications that tolerate occasional delays. Selecting the appropriate method depends on workload requirements, GPU capabilities, and the need for isolation.

Interested in GPU Servers and Clusters?

GPU Server Pricing

High-performance GPU hardware with detailed specs and transparent pricing.

View Options

Schedule a Consultation

Let’s discuss your GPU or AI needs and tailor a solution that fits your goals.

Schedule Meeting

Private AI Labs

$50k in credits to accelerate your AI project in a secure, private environment.

Apply Now

Read More From OpenMetal

Don’t Bet Your AI Startup on Public Cloud by Default – Here’s Where Private Infrastructure Wins

Many AI startups default to public cloud and face soaring costs, performance issues, and compliance risks. This article explores how private AI infrastructure delivers predictable pricing, dedicated resources, and better business outcomes—setting you up for success.

Secure and Scalable AI Experimentation with Kasm Workspaces and OpenMetal

In a recent live webinar, OpenMetal’s Todd Robinson sat down with Emrul Islam from Kasm Technologies to explore how container-based Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) and infrastructure flexibility can empower teams tackling everything from machine learning research to high-security operations.

Announcing the launch of Private AI Labs Program – Up to $50K in infrastructure usage credits

With the new OpenMetal Private AI Labs program, you can access private GPU servers and clusters tailored for your AI projects. By joining, you’ll receive up to $50,000 in usage credits to test, build, and scale your AI workloads.

GPU Servers & Clusters Now Available on OpenMetal – Powering Private AI, ML & More

GPU Servers and Clusters are now available on OpenMetal—giving you dedicated access to enterprise-grade NVIDIA A100 and H100 GPUs on fully private, high-performance infrastructure.

Cold Start Latency in AI Inference: Why It Matters in Private Environments

Cold start latency becomes a visible and impactful factor in private environments and can slow down AI inference, especially when infrastructure is deployed on-demand to optimize resource usage or reduce costs. Learn causes, impacts, and how to reduce delay for faster, reliable performance.

Intel AMX Enables High-Efficiency CPU Inference for AI Workloads

Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions (AMX) is an instruction set designed to improve AI inference performance on CPUs. It enhances the execution of matrix multiplication operations—a core component of many deep learning workloads—directly on Intel Xeon processors. AMX is part of Intel’s broader move to make CPUs more viable for AI inference by introducing architectural accelerations that can significantly improve throughput without relying on GPUs.

Comparing Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) and Time-Slicing for GPU Resource Sharing

Modern GPU technologies offer multiple methods for sharing hardware resources across workloads. Two widely used approaches are Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) and time-slicing. Both methods aim to improve utilization and reduce costs, but they differ significantly in implementation, performance, and isolation.

Comparing GPU Costs for AI Workloads: Factors Beyond Hardware Price

When comparing GPU costs between providers, the price of the GPU alone does not reflect the total cost or value of the service. The architecture of the deployment, access levels, support for GPU features, and billing models significantly affect long-term expenses and usability.

Comparing NVIDIA H100 vs A100 GPUs for AI Workloads

As demand for AI and machine learning infrastructure accelerates, hardware decisions increasingly affect both model performance and operational costs. The NVIDIA A100 and H100 are two of the most widely adopted GPUs for large-scale AI workloads. While both support advanced features like Multi-Instance GPU (MIG), they differ significantly in performance, architecture, and use case suitability.

Comparing AI Compute Options: API Endpoints, Public Cloud GPUs, and Private Cloud GPU Deployments

The demand for GPU compute resources has expanded alongside the growth of AI and machine learning workloads. Users today have multiple pathways to access these resources depending on their requirements for cost, control, and performance. This article breaks down three common tiers of AI compute services, their advantages, and trade-offs.