This two-part article delves into the hidden challenges of public cloud pricing models and offers actionable strategies for startups and scaleups to manage costs effectively while ensuring the performance and scalability essential for growth and success.
For startups and scaleups, the cloud is an essential foundation for innovation and growth. Public cloud providers, with their free-tier offerings and easy scalability, often seem like the natural choice for young businesses seeking agility and flexibility. However, as businesses grow and usage increases, many discover that the allure of the public cloud comes with hidden costs and complexities that can significantly impact their bottom line. Lets look into some of the known and not so known challenges and pitfalls of the public cloud pricing model.
Pitfalls of Public Cloud Pricing Models
Unpredictable Pay-as-You-Go Costs
Cloud computing has revolutionized access to advanced technologies, with pay-as-you-go pricing from public cloud providers playing a pivotal role in this transformation. This model offers startups and scaleups the flexibility to adjust workloads based on demand, aligning costs with immediate needs. However, it often introduces unpredictable monthly bills. Startups leveraging auto-scaling or underestimating usage spikes can encounter unexpected costs that strain their budgets. For scaleups, the challenge intensifies as exponential growth in customer demand drives up usage—and expenses—significantly.
Overprovisioning and Idle Resources
Overprovisioning in cloud environments is a prevalent issue, leading to significant financial inefficiencies.
A study by CAST AI revealed that, on average, only 13% of provisioned CPUs and 20% of allocated memory in Kubernetes clusters are utilized, leaving a substantial portion of resources—and associated costs—wasted. Source: DataCenter Dynamics
This tendency to overprovision stems from a cautious approach to avoid performance bottlenecks, resulting in underutilized instances that still incur charges. Conversely, workloads with intermittent demands can lead to idle resources, further contributing to unnecessary expenses. The financial impact is considerable.
Estimates suggest that up to $14.5 billion is wasted annually on idle cloud resources, with an additional $8.7 billion lost due to overprovisioning. Source: Business2Community
Vendor Lock-In
Startups that build their infrastructure deeply integrated with a single public cloud provider may find it expensive and complex to migrate later. Vendor-specific tools and architectures can create dependencies, limiting flexibility and driving up costs as businesses scale.
A notable example is Broadcom’s acquisition of VMware, which has had a considerable impact on customers dependent on VMware’s virtualization solutions. In the wake of the acquisition, Broadcom introduced several changes, such as discontinuing perpetual license sales, streamlining VMware products into fewer SKUs, and eliminating the channel partner program. These moves have prompted many businesses to reevaluate their reliance on VMware, with some actively seeking alternative platforms to mitigate potential risks.
This scenario underscores the challenges of vendor lock-in. When a service provider undergoes significant changes—such as a merger or acquisition—customers deeply integrated with that provider’s ecosystem may face increased costs, altered service terms, or discontinued support for certain products. Transitioning away from such entrenched systems can be complex and costly, especially if the infrastructure heavily depends on proprietary tools and architectures.
Egress Fees: The Hidden Cost of Data Movement
Egress fees—charges for moving data out of the cloud provider’s network—are one of the most notorious hidden costs of public cloud. These fees can escalate rapidly, particularly for startups and scaleups dealing with data-intensive workloads like streaming, analytics, or content delivery. Companies often underestimate how quickly these costs add up, especially when serving global user bases or integrating with external systems.
A study by Wasabi Technologies highlighted that some customers found egress fees constituted up to 50% of their total cloud expenses. Source: DataCenter Dynamics
Statistics like this underscore the substantial financial impact these fees can have on businesses.
As we’ve seen, the promise of flexibility and scalability in public cloud environments often comes with hidden costs that can strain budgets, especially for startups and scaleups. From egress fees and overprovisioned resources to the risks of vendor lock-in, these challenges highlight the need for a more strategic approach to cloud infrastructure.
But the story doesn’t end here. While the pitfalls of public cloud pricing can be daunting, businesses aren’t without options. In the next part of this series, we’ll explore practical strategies to combat these costs, from smarter usage monitoring to exploring alternative infrastructure models that align better with your business goals.
Stay tuned for Part 2 to discover how you can turn cloud challenges into opportunities for greater efficiency and control.
Read More on the OpenMetal Blog