Comparing GPU Costs for AI Workloads: Factors Beyond Hardware Price

Updated on April 7, 2025 by Rafael Ramos

When comparing GPU costs between providers, the price of the GPU alone does not reflect the total cost or value of the service. The architecture of the deployment, access levels, support for GPU features, and billing models significantly affect long-term expenses and usability. Below are key factors to consider when comparing GPU offerings.

1. Access Model: CPU vs Direct GPU Access

Many providers offer GPU-backed services without granting customers direct control of the hardware. Some GPU services only expose the GPU through APIs or virtual machines, limiting access to the underlying system, including the BIOS.

Direct access provides full control over GPU configuration, firmware, and environment. This is necessary for users needing:

  • BIOS access for fine-tuning performance or power settings
  • Control over driver versions
  • Ability to attach GPUs to hypervisors or bare-metal systems

Customers should verify if they are paying for compute (CPU) cycles with indirect GPU usage or for dedicated GPU hardware with full access.

2. Shared vs Dedicated GPU Resources

Understanding whether GPU resources are shared or dedicated is critical:

  • Shared GPU models often rely on time-slicing or virtual GPUs (vGPU), which reduce cost but can impact performance predictability.
  • Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) is available on A100, H100, and similar GPUs. It provides hardware-level isolation while allowing multiple tenants to share a single GPU instance safely.
  • Time-slicing offers a software-based sharing model with less isolation and potential resource contention.

Workloads requiring consistent performance, such as AI training or inference at scale, benefit from dedicated GPUs or MIG with guaranteed bandwidth and memory allocation.

3. Supported Features and Customization

Hardware features, such as NVLink, MIG support, Time-Slicing, and specialized encoders/decoders can be critical for certain workloads. It is important to confirm:

  • Is MIG and Time-Slicing supported and configurable?
  • Can you customize GPU partitioning?
  • Is the system expandable (more GPUs, RAM, or storage)?
  • Can you run containers or Kubernetes on the platform?
  • Are CPU specs, networking, and storage optimized for GPU performance?

Deployments limited to fixed configurations may not meet the needs of evolving AI/ML workloads.

4. Right-Sizing the Deployment

Over-provisioning GPU resources can result in paying for idle capacity. Customers should evaluate:

  • Expected utilization rates
  • The ability to scale resources based on workload spikes
  • Access to start/stop billing models or on-demand GPU consumption

For workloads that do not require continuous GPU access, burstable GPU services or environments supporting workload-based billing reduce costs. Private cloud providers like OpenMetal offer dedicated environments but also support multi-year agreements that balance flexibility with cost savings.

5. Agreement Lengths and Long-Term Discounts

Service agreements vary widely between providers:

  • Hourly or daily on-demand rates are useful for bursty workloads but carry premium pricing.
  • Monthly commitments offer moderate discounts.
  • Long-term agreements (up to 5 years) significantly lower the total cost of ownership.

OpenMetal, for example, offers up to 5-year agreements that reduce the cost of dedicated GPU clusters for customers with predictable needs.

6. Hardware Transparency and BIOS Access

For AI workloads requiring fine-tuned optimization, access to BIOS settings is often necessary. This allows users to adjust:

  • Power limits
  • Memory speed
  • CPU/GPU affinity

Most cloud GPU providers do not provide BIOS-level control. Bare metal deployments or private clouds are more likely to offer this capability.

7. Network and Storage Considerations

GPU-intensive workloads are sensitive to network bandwidth and storage throughput. When comparing offerings:

  • Ensure adequate east-west network bandwidth for distributed AI training
  • Confirm support for local NVMe or high-speed shared storage
  • Evaluate latency and bandwidth guarantees

Interested in GPU Servers and Clusters?

GPU Server Pricing

High-performance GPU hardware with detailed specs and transparent pricing.

View Options

Schedule a Consultation

Let’s discuss your GPU or AI needs and tailor a solution that fits your goals.

Schedule Meeting

Private AI Labs

$50k in credits to accelerate your AI project in a secure, private environment.

Apply Now

Read More From OpenMetal

Don’t Bet Your AI Startup on Public Cloud by Default – Here’s Where Private Infrastructure Wins

Many AI startups default to public cloud and face soaring costs, performance issues, and compliance risks. This article explores how private AI infrastructure delivers predictable pricing, dedicated resources, and better business outcomes—setting you up for success.

Secure and Scalable AI Experimentation with Kasm Workspaces and OpenMetal

In a recent live webinar, OpenMetal’s Todd Robinson sat down with Emrul Islam from Kasm Technologies to explore how container-based Virtual Desktop Infrastructure (VDI) and infrastructure flexibility can empower teams tackling everything from machine learning research to high-security operations.

Announcing the launch of Private AI Labs Program – Up to $50K in infrastructure usage credits

With the new OpenMetal Private AI Labs program, you can access private GPU servers and clusters tailored for your AI projects. By joining, you’ll receive up to $50,000 in usage credits to test, build, and scale your AI workloads.

GPU Servers & Clusters Now Available on OpenMetal – Powering Private AI, ML & More

GPU Servers and Clusters are now available on OpenMetal—giving you dedicated access to enterprise-grade NVIDIA A100 and H100 GPUs on fully private, high-performance infrastructure.

Cold Start Latency in AI Inference: Why It Matters in Private Environments

Cold start latency becomes a visible and impactful factor in private environments and can slow down AI inference, especially when infrastructure is deployed on-demand to optimize resource usage or reduce costs. Learn causes, impacts, and how to reduce delay for faster, reliable performance.

Intel AMX Enables High-Efficiency CPU Inference for AI Workloads

Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions (AMX) is an instruction set designed to improve AI inference performance on CPUs. It enhances the execution of matrix multiplication operations—a core component of many deep learning workloads—directly on Intel Xeon processors. AMX is part of Intel’s broader move to make CPUs more viable for AI inference by introducing architectural accelerations that can significantly improve throughput without relying on GPUs.

Comparing Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) and Time-Slicing for GPU Resource Sharing

Modern GPU technologies offer multiple methods for sharing hardware resources across workloads. Two widely used approaches are Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) and time-slicing. Both methods aim to improve utilization and reduce costs, but they differ significantly in implementation, performance, and isolation.

Comparing GPU Costs for AI Workloads: Factors Beyond Hardware Price

When comparing GPU costs between providers, the price of the GPU alone does not reflect the total cost or value of the service. The architecture of the deployment, access levels, support for GPU features, and billing models significantly affect long-term expenses and usability.

Comparing NVIDIA H100 vs A100 GPUs for AI Workloads

As demand for AI and machine learning infrastructure accelerates, hardware decisions increasingly affect both model performance and operational costs. The NVIDIA A100 and H100 are two of the most widely adopted GPUs for large-scale AI workloads. While both support advanced features like Multi-Instance GPU (MIG), they differ significantly in performance, architecture, and use case suitability.

Comparing AI Compute Options: API Endpoints, Public Cloud GPUs, and Private Cloud GPU Deployments

The demand for GPU compute resources has expanded alongside the growth of AI and machine learning workloads. Users today have multiple pathways to access these resources depending on their requirements for cost, control, and performance. This article breaks down three common tiers of AI compute services, their advantages, and trade-offs.