Cloud infrastructure was supposed to deliver cost efficiency and scalability for SaaS companies. Instead, for many private equity-backed portfolio companies, it has become a margin-eroding expense that threatens EBITDA targets and reduces enterprise valuations. The response from PE operating partners and portfolio company CFOs has been decisive: systematically evaluate cloud repatriation strategies that convert variable infrastructure expenses into predictable fixed costs.
The Strategic Shift to Private Cloud
The shift to cloud repatriation doesn’t just reduce monthly bills—it fundamentally improves the financial profile of SaaS companies by eliminating the cost volatility that makes EBITDA forecasting difficult and margin expansion challenging. The culprit isn’t the technology itself—it’s the economic model that penalizes growth through usage-based pricing, unpredictable billing, and resource inefficiencies that compound over time.
Companies like 37Signals (makers of Basecamp and HEY) made headlines by sharing how they saved over a million dollars annually by leaving the cloud, demonstrating that cloud repatriation represents more than cost optimization—it’s a strategic repositioning that improves both current profitability and long-term valuation multiples.
The Hidden Mechanics of Cloud Cost Volatility
Understanding why cloud costs undermine EBITDA requires examining the specific billing mechanisms that create unpredictability in SaaS infrastructure spend. Unlike traditional software licensing or hardware depreciation, public cloud costs fluctuate based on usage patterns, data transfer volumes, and resource allocation decisions that teams make daily.
Usage-Based Pricing Creates Margin Pressure
The fundamental challenge with public cloud billing stems from its usage-based pricing model, which directly ties infrastructure costs to business growth. When your SaaS company acquires new customers or processes more data, infrastructure costs increase immediately—often faster than the revenue those customers generate. This creates a direct drag on gross margins precisely when companies should be benefiting from scale economics.
Public cloud costs can reach 50% of total cost of revenue for software companies, and actual spend typically exceeds committed spend by significant margins. For PE-backed companies under pressure to demonstrate consistent EBITDA growth, this unpredictability makes financial planning difficult and margin expansion targets harder to achieve.
The billing volatility becomes particularly problematic during seasonal traffic spikes, product launches, or customer onboarding periods. Teams often over-provision resources to avoid performance issues, knowing that under-provisioning could impact customer experience, but this defensive approach drives up costs without corresponding revenue increases.
Resource Inefficiency Compounds Costs
In typical public cloud deployments, workloads use roughly 30% of allocated resources on average and burst to use no more than 30% more over time, leaving approximately 40% of VM resources wasted. Yet you still pay for 100% of those allocated resources whether you use them or not.
This inefficiency occurs because public cloud providers optimize for their own economics, not yours. They design instance types and pricing models that maximize their revenue per server, which often means you’re paying for resources your applications can’t effectively use. The waste is particularly acute for SaaS applications with predictable workload patterns that don’t require the elasticity that justifies public cloud premiums.
The Data Egress Tax
Data transfer costs represent one of the most problematic hidden expenses for growing SaaS companies. These charges are often minimal during initial deployment but compound as customer bases grow and data processing increases. Overprovisioning, idle VMs, data egress fees—all add up quickly, creating cost structures that penalize business success.
The challenge is that egress fees are largely invisible during architecture and budgeting phases. Development teams focus on compute and storage costs during planning, but data transfer pricing only becomes apparent after deployment when changing architecture becomes expensive and disruptive.
How PE Firms Are Responding: The Repatriation Movement
Private equity operating partners are recognizing cloud repatriation as a systematic value creation opportunity across their SaaS portfolios. Cloud repatriation isn’t a meme—it’s a movement, driven by the realization that infrastructure costs directly impact gross margins and, consequently, company valuations.
Strategic Assessment Across Portfolios
The most sophisticated PE firms are conducting portfolio-wide assessments of cloud spending patterns, identifying companies where infrastructure optimization can deliver immediate EBITDA improvements. If your value prop involves control, security, or cost-efficiency—cloud repatriation is not a trend. It’s your moat.
This assessment typically focuses on companies spending more than $100,000 monthly on public cloud infrastructure, where the scale justifies migration efforts. Operating partners are also evaluating companies approaching diligence phases, as improved gross margins and predictable cost structures enhance valuations during the evaluation process.
Building Migration Strategies
Most startups don’t have the engineering bandwidth to manage bare metal. That’s where indie cloud providers, micro data centers, and localized VM platforms come in. PE firms are partnering with hosted private cloud providers that eliminate the operational complexity of infrastructure management while delivering the cost benefits of dedicated resources.
The migration strategies typically follow a phased approach: development and staging environments move first, allowing teams to validate performance and cost savings before transitioning customer-facing systems. Data-intensive applications often see the largest improvements, as these workloads frequently trigger significant egress charges in public cloud but operate efficiently within private cloud environments.
OpenMetal’s Fixed-Cost Model: Converting Variables to Constants
OpenMetal’s approach directly addresses the cost volatility that undermines SaaS EBITDA by replacing usage-based billing with predictable fixed costs. This isn’t just about reducing monthly expenses—it’s about fundamentally changing the economic profile of infrastructure spend.
Predictable Hardware-Based Pricing
OpenMetal pricing is fixed and based on dedicated hardware, not variable usage metrics. Each server includes full compute, memory, storage, and networking without per-instance charges or metered API costs. This eliminates the billing complexity that makes public cloud costs difficult to forecast and budget.
For PE-backed SaaS companies, this predictability enables more accurate EBITDA forecasting and eliminates the margin compression that occurs when infrastructure costs scale faster than revenue. CFOs can model infrastructure expenses as fixed costs rather than variables that fluctuate with business performance.
Right-Sized Hardware Configurations
Rather than being forced into predetermined public cloud instance types, SaaS companies can select hardware configurations that match their actual workload requirements. Medium V4 servers use Intel Xeon Silver 4510 processors with 256 GB DDR5 memory, suitable for smaller SaaS platforms or development environments.
Large V4 configurations with Intel Xeon Gold 6526Y processors and 512 GB DDR5 memory handle production workloads for growing SaaS companies. For compute-intensive applications, XL V4 and XXL V4 servers with Intel Xeon Gold 6530 processors provide 1 TB and 2 TB DDR5 memory respectively.
This hardware-based approach typically results in 30-50% cost savings compared to equivalent public cloud deployments while providing dedicated resources that improve performance predictability.
Included Data Transfer
Outbound data is included per server, with any overage billed at $375 per Gbps using the 95th percentile method, equivalent to about 180 TB. Internal traffic between servers is completely unmetered. This eliminates the data egress fees that create hidden costs in public cloud environments and allows SaaS companies to architect applications without worrying about data transfer charges.
Rapid Deployment Without Complexity
Private clouds deploy in about 45 seconds, and new servers can be added in approximately 20 minutes. This deployment speed eliminates the infrastructure delays that often justify public cloud usage while providing dedicated resources from day one.
Ceph storage provides block, object, and file storage in the same environment, creating unified storage architecture that simplifies application development and eliminates the complexity of managing multiple storage services.
The EBITDA Mathematics: Quantifying Value Creation
The financial impact of cloud repatriation extends beyond monthly cost reductions to fundamental improvements in SaaS company financial profiles. For PE firms focused on EBITDA growth and exit valuations, understanding these metrics becomes critical for portfolio optimization.
Direct Cost Impact
Converting variable cloud costs to fixed private cloud expenses typically reduces total infrastructure spending by 30-50% for SaaS companies with predictable workloads. For a portfolio company spending $2 million annually on public cloud infrastructure, this represents $600,000 to $1 million in direct cost savings that flows immediately to EBITDA.
The savings compound over time as companies avoid the usage-based pricing increases that typically accompany business growth in public cloud environments. SaaS companies can scale customer bases and data volumes without proportional increases in infrastructure costs, improving unit economics and customer lifetime value calculations.
Margin Predictability Premium
Beyond direct cost savings, the predictability of fixed infrastructure costs enables more accurate financial forecasting and reduces the volatility that markets penalize in SaaS valuations. CFOs can model infrastructure as a fixed percentage of revenue rather than a variable that fluctuates with usage patterns.
This predictability becomes particularly valuable during fundraising or exit processes, where consistent margins and clear cost structures enhance company valuations. Buyers and investors value SaaS companies with predictable unit economics and clear paths to margin expansion.
Portfolio-Level Impact
For PE-backed companies facing pressure to control costs while maintaining growth trajectories, the total cost of ownership (TCO) comparison between private and public cloud becomes critical to strategic decision-making. Operating partners managing multiple SaaS companies can implement consistent infrastructure strategies that optimize costs across the entire portfolio.
The compounding effect across a portfolio can be substantial. If multiple portfolio companies are spending 50-75% of cost of revenue on cloud infrastructure, coordinated optimization efforts can deliver millions in annual cost savings and tens of millions in increased valuations at exit.
Migration Support: Reducing Operational Risk
One of the primary concerns PE operating partners express about cloud repatriation is the operational risk of migrating production workloads. OpenMetal addresses this through comprehensive migration support that reduces both technical and business risks.
Engineer-Assisted Onboarding
Migration support includes engineer-assisted onboarding that helps portfolio companies plan and execute transitions without disrupting customer-facing services. This support covers architecture review, migration planning, and performance optimization to ensure applications operate efficiently in the new environment.
Ramp Pricing Strategy
Ramp pricing allows companies to gradually transition workloads while managing cash flow during the migration period. This approach eliminates the need for large upfront commitments while enabling companies to validate cost savings and performance improvements before full migration.
Direct Engineering Access
Direct access to OpenMetal engineers provides ongoing support that reduces the operational burden on portfolio company teams. This support model allows SaaS companies to benefit from private cloud economics without requiring significant increases in internal infrastructure expertise.
Implementation Strategy for PE Portfolio Companies
Successful cloud repatriation requires systematic assessment and phased implementation across portfolio companies. The most effective approaches follow proven methodologies that minimize risk while maximizing EBITDA impact.
Candidate Assessment
The best candidates for cloud repatriation typically have annual cloud spending approaching $1 million or more, predictable workload patterns with consistent resource requirements, and cloud costs representing 50% or more of cost of revenue. Applications requiring consistent performance characteristics—such as real-time processing or customer-facing APIs with strict SLA requirements—benefit from the dedicated resources and predictable latency that private cloud provides.
Phased Migration Approach
Rather than attempting to migrate all workloads simultaneously, successful transitions often begin with development and staging environments, allowing teams to build familiarity with the new platform before transitioning customer-facing systems. Production workloads with predictable resource requirements represent the next logical candidates for migration.
Financial Modeling
Accurate ROI calculations should include both direct cost savings and indirect benefits like improved performance and reduced operational complexity. The most comprehensive models account for staff time, support costs, and the value of improved predictability in financial planning.
Building Infrastructure as a Competitive Advantage
As more startups discover that the cloud’s biggest feature—elasticity—can also be its biggest trap, this trend will only grow. For PE-backed SaaS companies, treating infrastructure as a strategic asset rather than just an operational expense creates sustainable competitive advantages.
Performance as Product Differentiation
Dedicated infrastructure resources provide performance consistency that can become a product differentiator, particularly for enterprise SaaS offerings where reliability and responsiveness directly impact customer satisfaction and retention rates.
Cost Structure as Competitive Moat
Predictable infrastructure costs enable more aggressive pricing strategies and higher gross margins, creating competitive advantages that compound over time. SaaS companies with efficient infrastructure can invest more in product development, sales, and marketing while maintaining healthy unit economics.
Infrastructure Consistency Across Portfolio
PE firms can implement standardized infrastructure approaches across portfolio companies, sharing best practices and optimizations that improve financial performance consistently across the entire portfolio.
The Strategic Imperative: Moving Beyond Cost Optimization
Cloud repatriation represents more than tactical cost reduction for PE portfolio companies—it’s a strategic repositioning that improves both current financial performance and long-term value creation potential. Are you renting your infrastructure, or investing in it?
The most successful PE firms are recognizing infrastructure optimization as a systematic value creation opportunity that delivers measurable EBITDA improvements while positioning portfolio companies for premium exit valuations. By converting variable cloud costs into predictable fixed expenses, SaaS companies can improve unit economics, enhance margin predictability, and create sustainable competitive advantages that compound over time.
For portfolio companies spending significant amounts on public cloud infrastructure, the question isn’t whether to evaluate cloud repatriation—it’s how quickly they can implement strategies that convert infrastructure costs from EBITDA drags into competitive advantages.
The economics are clear: fixed infrastructure costs, predictable billing, and dedicated resources typically deliver 30-50% cost savings while improving performance consistency and operational predictability. For PE firms focused on EBITDA growth and value creation, cloud repatriation has moved from interesting option to strategic imperative.
Ready to evaluate how cloud repatriation can improve EBITDA across your SaaS portfolio? Explore OpenMetal’s PE firm program →
Read More on the OpenMetal Blog