Cold start latency refers to the initial delay encountered when an AI model is loaded and executed after a period of inactivity or when it is first deployed. This latency is caused by the need to allocate compute resources, load model weights into memory, initialize inference runtimes, and establish any necessary data pipelines.

In public AI services delivered through managed APIs, this process is abstracted and amortized across a large user base. Users rarely experience cold starts directly because models are preloaded and systems are scaled for continuous availability.

In contrast, private environments require the end user or operator to manage these aspects explicitly. Cold start latency becomes a more visible and impactful factor, especially when infrastructure is deployed on-demand to optimize resource usage or reduce costs.

Causes of Cold Start Latency

  1. Model Weight Loading: Large language models can reach tens of gigabytes in size. Loading these weights from disk into memory is a time-consuming step, especially when not optimized through memory mapping or persistent RAM usage.
  2. Container Initialization: Inference services often run in containers or virtual machines. Starting a new container, attaching GPUs via passthrough or mediated devices, and initializing inference frameworks like PyTorch or TensorRT can introduce measurable delays.
  3. Runtime Compilation: Some inference engines perform just-in-time compilation or kernel selection based on the underlying hardware. This compilation step increases the time-to-first-token in private environments where workloads are not always pre-optimized for the exact hardware configuration.
  4. Data Pipeline Setup: Tokenizers, decoders, and other preprocessing/postprocessing steps must also be initialized. In distributed systems, network-attached storage or API-based preprocessing may further extend this delay.

Why It Matters in Private Environments

Private environments often lack the scale to maintain always-on model services for every possible inference request. This is especially true when many different models are deployed concurrently, requiring dynamic allocation of compute resources. As a result, they rely on on-demand resource allocation. This makes cold start latency more visible and impactful, particularly in applications requiring prompt responses, such as chat interfaces or low-latency decision-making systems.

Whereas public AI services can spread infrastructure costs and performance optimizations across many tenants, private operators may experience large performance variations between warm and cold inference calls. For example, a model might respond in under 100 milliseconds when warm but take 5 to 20 seconds when cold.

Mitigation Strategies

  • Model Preloading: Keep frequently used models loaded in memory on reserved hosts. This requires careful planning of GPU memory usage but eliminates the loading phase.
  • Pre-warmed Containers: Maintain idle, initialized containers that are ready to receive inference requests immediately. This approach increases idle resource consumption but greatly reduces response time variability.
  • GPU Sharing with MIG or Time-Slicing: Allow preloaded models to reside in persistent GPU instances using NVIDIA’s Multi-Instance GPU or time-slicing modes, minimizing container spin-up delays.
  • Memory Mapping and Optimized Storage: Use memory-mapped model formats or faster local storage to reduce weight loading times. One example is Hugging Face’s safetensors, which supports safe and efficient memory mapping of model weights. Another is the GGUF (GPT Generated Unified Format) used with libraries like llama.cpp, designed for fast model loading with low overhead. Additionally, TensorRT engines stored on NVMe devices can also reduce cold start delays.
  • Runtime Configuration Tuning: Disable unneeded compilation steps or explicitly define kernel profiles for known hardware to bypass runtime selection overhead. For example, in TensorRT, specifying the exact GPU architecture and precision mode ahead of time avoids time-consuming runtime optimizations during the first inference request.

Observability and Planning

Cold start latency is not always accounted for in model benchmarking. Operators should instrument their inference pipelines to track first-request latency separately from sustained throughput. This data is critical for sizing infrastructure appropriately and ensuring consistent application performance.

In private environments with tailored workloads and deliberate resource use, managing cold start latency helps maintain consistent and efficient AI inference.

Interested in GPU Servers and Clusters?

GPU Server Pricing

High-performance GPU hardware with detailed specs and transparent pricing.

View Options

Schedule a Consultation

Let’s discuss your GPU or AI needs and tailor a solution that fits your goals.

Schedule Meeting

Private AI Labs

$50k in credits to accelerate your AI project in a secure, private environment.

Apply Now

Read More From OpenMetal

Announcing the launch of Private AI Labs Program – Up to $50K in infrastructure usage credits

With the new OpenMetal Private AI Labs program, you can access private GPU servers and clusters tailored for your AI projects. By joining, you’ll receive up to $50,000 in usage credits to test, build, and scale your AI workloads.

GPU Servers & Clusters Now Available on OpenMetal – Powering Private AI, ML & More

GPU Servers and Clusters are now available on OpenMetal—giving you dedicated access to enterprise-grade NVIDIA A100 and H100 GPUs on fully private, high-performance infrastructure.

Cold Start Latency in AI Inference: Why It Matters in Private Environments

Cold start latency becomes a visible and impactful factor in private environments and can slow down AI inference, especially when infrastructure is deployed on-demand to optimize resource usage or reduce costs. Learn causes, impacts, and how to reduce delay for faster, reliable performance.

Intel AMX Enables High-Efficiency CPU Inference for AI Workloads

Intel Advanced Matrix Extensions (AMX) is an instruction set designed to improve AI inference performance on CPUs. It enhances the execution of matrix multiplication operations—a core component of many deep learning workloads—directly on Intel Xeon processors. AMX is part of Intel’s broader move to make CPUs more viable for AI inference by introducing architectural accelerations that can significantly improve throughput without relying on GPUs.

Comparing Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) and Time-Slicing for GPU Resource Sharing

Modern GPU technologies offer multiple methods for sharing hardware resources across workloads. Two widely used approaches are Multi-Instance GPU (MIG) and time-slicing. Both methods aim to improve utilization and reduce costs, but they differ significantly in implementation, performance, and isolation.

Comparing GPU Costs for AI Workloads: Factors Beyond Hardware Price

When comparing GPU costs between providers, the price of the GPU alone does not reflect the total cost or value of the service. The architecture of the deployment, access levels, support for GPU features, and billing models significantly affect long-term expenses and usability.

Comparing NVIDIA H100 vs A100 GPUs for AI Workloads

As demand for AI and machine learning infrastructure accelerates, hardware decisions increasingly affect both model performance and operational costs. The NVIDIA A100 and H100 are two of the most widely adopted GPUs for large-scale AI workloads. While both support advanced features like Multi-Instance GPU (MIG), they differ significantly in performance, architecture, and use case suitability.

Comparing AI Compute Options: API Endpoints, Public Cloud GPUs, and Private Cloud GPU Deployments

The demand for GPU compute resources has expanded alongside the growth of AI and machine learning workloads. Users today have multiple pathways to access these resources depending on their requirements for cost, control, and performance. This article breaks down three common tiers of AI compute services, their advantages, and trade-offs.

Solving AI’s Most Pressing Deployment Challenges: Secure Collaboration, Infrastructure Sprawl, and Scalable Experimentation

Explore real-world solutions to AI deployment challenges—from managing secure, container-based environments to scaling GPU infrastructure efficiently. Learn how Kasm Workspaces and OpenMetal enable secure collaboration, cost control, and streamlined experimentation for AI teams.

Measuring AI Model Performance: Tokens per Second, Model Sizes, and Inferencing Tools

Accurately measuring AI model performance requires a focus on tokens per second, specifically output generation rates. Understanding tokenization, model size, quantization, and inference tool selection is essential for comparing hardware and software environments.