Companies already create vast amounts of data every day, and the growing usage of big data and AI is now skyrocketing the need for robust, scalable cloud storage solutions. Two popular platforms are Ceph and AWS S3. Both offer capable solutions for managing and storing large amounts of data. However their architectures, capabilities, and use cases differ quite a bit. Let’s compare and contrast these two platforms to help you decide which may be the better choice for your storage needs.
Ceph: Flexible Distributed Storage
Ceph, an open-source distributed storage platform, provides a unified approach to object, block, and file storage. Its self-healing, self-managing architecture, coupled with its ability to scale to exabyte levels, makes it an attractive choice for organizations seeking granular control and cost-efficiency.
At the core of Ceph lies the Ceph Storage Cluster – a deployment of monitors and OSDs, forming the foundation for all Ceph-based services. Ceph’s core components include monitors, managers, metadata servers, object storage devices (OSDs), and RESTful gateways (RGWs). Monitors track cluster health, managers provide additional monitoring, metadata servers handle filesystem metadata, OSDs store data objects, and RGWs expose object storage via S3-compatible APIs. Ceph’s RADOS (Reliable Autonomic Distributed Object Store) forms the foundation for its block and file storage capabilities, offering features like snapshotting, replication, and consistency. This distributed architecture ensures high availability, fault tolerance, and linear scalability.
Ceph offers fantastic flexibility and scalability. But its operational complexity and the need for specialized expertise to make sure it’s set up and functioning correctly may be a turn off for some.
AWS S3: Cloud-Native Object Storage
AWS S3, on the other hand, is a fully managed object storage service that offers simplicity and scalability. Built for the cloud, S3 is able to handle large amounts of data with high availability and durability. It’s optimized for storing and retrieving objects, making it ideal for unstructured data like images, videos, and log files. Its RESTful API and integration with other AWS services make it a natural choice for businesses already within the AWS ecosystem. S3 also includes helpful features like versioning, lifecycle management, and access control.
However, S3’s closed-source nature, potential vendor lock-in, and cost implications for large-scale data storage can be significant downsides. Additionally, while S3 offers object storage, accessing data in block or file formats requires additional services and potential performance trade-offs.
When to Choose Ceph or S3
Feature | Ceph | AWS S3 |
|---|---|---|
| License Model | Open source | Closed source |
| Deployment Model | Can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud | Cloud-native, tied to the AWS ecosystem |
Storage Types | Object, block, file | Object |
| Consistency Model | Strong | Eventual |
| Cost | Likely lower TCO due to open source and hardware flexibility, but operational costs should be considered | Pay-per-use, potentially higher usage costs but a predictable pricing model |
| Control | Full control over hardware and software | Limited control, managed service |
The decision to use Ceph or S3 depends on several factors, including:
- Control: Organizations seeking granular control over their storage infrastructure and data often prefer Ceph.
- Cost: For extremely large datasets or demanding performance requirements, Ceph can offer cost advantages over S3.
- Complexity: S3 is generally easier to deploy and manage than Ceph.
- Integration: If you already use AWS, S3 is the natural choice.
- Data Types: Ceph‘s versatility in handling object, block, and file data without requiring additional services makes it suitable for a wider range of workloads than S3.
Ceph Demo
Want to see Ceph in action? Watch OpenMetal’s Director of Cloud Systems Architecture demonstrate how to create and use a Ceph storage cluster.
Wrapping Up
Hopefully this has provided some helpful information in understanding the core differences between Ceph and S3, two powerful cloud storage solutions. Both are more than capable of handling large data sets efficiently. The decision on which to use will mainly depend on your level of technical knowledge, current cloud infrastructure, budgetary goals, desired level of control and flexibility, and whether you prefer an open or closed source system.
We believe Ceph is a great S3 alternative software and it forms the basis of our storage systems – both on hyper-converged and converged clouds and the standalone Ceph powered petabyte scale storage systems we offer. Our Ceph-powered storage clusters provide exabyte-level storage with unparalleled reliability. Take charge of replication, erasure coding, and performance enhancements using NVMe drives. Seamlessly replicate data for recovery. Select your ideal Ceph version. Redefine your storage experience. Learn More
Read More on the OpenMetal Blog
Value-Driven OpenStack and Ceph Clouds – OpenInfra Summit 2023
OpenMetal Infrastructure and Platform Automations Engineer, Yuriy Shyyan, delves into the challenges and opportunities faced by growing businesses when it comes to cloud infrastructure costs and vendor dependency.
Delta Lake Deployment with Spark and MLFlow on Ceph and OpenStack
In order to support customer requests, we are creating a standard open source only install of Delta Lake, Spark, and optionally, supporting systems like MLflow.
Erasure Coding including Calculator
Erasure coding can be a bit confusing. It is also typically a decision that involves trade-offs between I/O performance needed for a particular storage process, initial and ongoing cost of the setup, and usable storage.