Q: How does the OpenMetal Medium v4 compare to AWS m7i instances?
The Medium v4 provides 24 dedicated physical cores, 256 GB DDR5, and 6.4 TB persistent local NVMe on single-tenant hardware, while the m7i family offers shared vCPUs with no local storage and per-GB egress billing.
The closest m7i match by RAM is the m7i.16xlarge (64 vCPUs, 256 GB) , which over-provisions CPU relative to the Medium v4’s 24 cores. By vCPU count, the m7i.8xlarge (32 vCPUs, 128 GB) is closer but provides half the memory. Neither m7i instance includes local storage: all I/O goes through EBS, adding per-GB/month cost and network-hop latency compared to the Medium v4’s direct-attached Micron 7500 MAX (1.1M random read IOPS, 70 microsecond typical latency).
The billing models differ structurally. OpenMetal charges a fixed monthly rate with optional 5-year price locks and 95th-percentile egress. AWS bills per hour on-demand (or via 1-3 year reserved instances) with per-GB egress starting at $0.09/GB . The Medium v4 includes full IPMI access for remote power, console, and BIOS control; m7i instances are accessible only via SSH or Systems Manager.
The Medium v4 is the stronger fit for sustained 24/7 workloads, egress-heavy applications, and scenarios requiring physical isolation or HIPAA-eligible infrastructure. AWS m7i is better suited for scale-to-zero workloads, deep AWS-native service integration, and organizations under $10,000/month in cloud spend.
Interested in OpenMetal Products?
Schedule a Consultation
Get a deeper assessment and discuss your unique requirements.